introduction

Entering architecture school feels like stepping into a whirlwind of unfamiliar names. Whether you are reading theory or studying history, you will constantly encounter architects, designers, and artists whose views on space, urbanism, and materiality are treated as "common knowledge."

Having recently completed my Part 1, I want to be honest with you: it is daunting. It is exhausting to balance complex design projects and physical models with the pressure to memorize a century of precedents. This journey often demands significant sacrifices in our personal lives, and it can be discouraging when tutors—perhaps subconsciously—expect us to magically possess an encyclopedic knowledge of movements and names we’ve barely heard of.

For three years, I struggled with time management and the pressure to produce quality work. Too often, we find ourselves "glued to the screen," suffocating under hours of software troubleshooting and 3D modeling while our foundational knowledge takes a backseat. We are expected to transition from being art students to "hyper-intellectual computer wizards" overnight, all while navigating a world changed by the isolation of the pandemic.

But here is what I’ve learned: theoretical knowledge is a muscle. It grows slowly and consistently; you aren't expected to lift the "heavy weights" of architectural history all at once. My goal with this project is to bridge that gap. I am documenting simplified research on key figures—focusing not just on what they built, but the philosophy behind it. By understanding these precedents, you gain authority over your own projects and the confidence to defend your concepts.

I am still on this journey with you. I am still growing my own "architectural muscle," and I hope this compilation helps you reach your full potential and express your creative ideas with ease.

If you are interested to be involved in with this project- feel free to contact me!

Thank you!